Find a Lawyer

QUETTA TEXTILE MILLS LTD., NADIR HOUSE, KARACHI versus PAKISTAN

Customs Act 1969 Section 18, 19, 25, 25 B & 31A Notification No. Section R 1050 (1) / 95, Dated 29 10 1995 Civil Procedure Code (V8 1908), Section 11 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition In the past and closed transaction regulatory duty, demand for judgment in the scope of the judgment, the judgment of the applicable matter between the parties was decided in a constitutional petition already filed by the petitioner, the respondent authorities No appeal was filed against him. Earlier in the petition, another similar case had been filed before the Supreme Court and it had obtained a valid judgment under which the respondents once based on the decision of the Supreme Court in the second case. Then the demand for regulatory duty was raised. Applicability of the applicant where the decision passed by the High Court in the previous petition was never challenged before such decision before the Supreme Court, the High Court agreement between the parties was finalized and the respondents could not turn over. And say that the matter is still alive after the decision cannot be reopened in any other application approved by the Supreme Court. Determination of the rights of the parties to the ban in the court of justice has been deemed final and has taken the form of past and closed transactions ??? In another petition, the decision of the High Court by the Supreme Court is set aside, under the rights derived by the parties. Will not reopen. The decision of the High Court against which no appeal was filed was filed by the applicant for payment of regulatory duty under section R1010 (1) / 95 relating to the importation of the said goods. property advocates from Kalar Syedian lawyer