Find a Lawyer

WAQAR AHMAD versus JUDGE, SPECIAL COURT SUPPRESSION OF ANTI-TERRORIST COURT NO. VI. MULTAN

Transfer of the case from the Special Sessions Court to the Special Sessions Court of Pakistan Penal Code Section 302 Terrorism Activities (Special Courts) Act (XV of 1975), Proposal and Sections 3, 6, 7 and 8 of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 According to a report by the Franz Science Laboratory, he was stopped after an extra-judicial confession accusing him of killing the victim using his .222 bore rifle, and an FIR was registered against unknown persons. In which the defendant was prayed for the transfer. The general session was dismissed from the court to the special court on the basis that the weapon used in the Schedule (Special Courts) Act, 1975, to suppress terrorist activity, was used to attract special court jurisdiction. Is enough for The presentation of pressures for terrorist activities to be tried by the Special Court, is aligned with the (Special Courts) Act, 1975, which provided that it should be an act of sabotage, insurrection or terrorism. The FIR is charged with the effective or ineffective use of weapons listed in the program schedule but this is not sufficient to attract the jurisdiction of the special court as the accused has been charged with murder. Unidentified persons, with the Preamble of the Terrorist Activities (Special Courts) Act, 1975, were guilty of indiscriminate killing, unidentified persons, indecency against the accused, misdemeanor or non-act of terrorism, The jurisdiction of the special court was not at all appealing. The court adjourned the case against the applicant / accused before the special court how to become a advocate from Chohar Jamali lawyer