Find a Lawyer

RAFHAT RASHID versus GHULAM SARWAR

The AJK Family Courts Act 1993 Section 5 and Schedule Sections 7, 8, 9 the pre-order case for marriage motions, keeping the plaintiff aside, on the direction of the court, the accused along with the list of witnesses and other documents. Sent a copy of Registered defendants failed to appear in court despite sending notice through registered post, causing notice for defendant's failure to appear in the newspaper even after publication of the notice on the court's direction, the trial After the court began examining the defendants and the witnesses presented by the plaintiffs and hearing the arguments, the former parliament's trial court approved the hearing on the petition, in order to set aside the earlier verdicts. The time limit for appearing was 15, which was set aside after the rule of law. A few days after his service and before Sai's expiration, the earlier proceedings against him were bound to separate the defendant from the time limit, prior judgment and decree, by the trial judge's decision. Frustrated, the defendant had deliberately absent himself, a previous partial decision could not be made against him. Sections 8 and 9 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Family Courts Act, 1993 were not compulsory for providing information about the defendant and filing a written statement by the defendant, but these were directory in nature as mentioned above. No penalty clause was provided for compliance with the above procedure. Provisions of law where no penal clause was provided by any law clause famous high court advocate from Chak Sawara lawyer