MUHAMMAD AKRAM versus SECRETARY AGRICULTURAL, COOPERATIVE GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, CIVIL SECRETARIAT, LAHORE
Civil Procedure 1908 Sections 114, 117 and O XLVII, RL Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Order passed by the High Court under its constitutional jurisdiction, the authority to review by the High Court applicants, the Constitution The petitioner, upset by the High Court-approved order, applied for a review of the decree, resisting the request that after the declaration of the decision, the High Court had become an offseason and constitutional jurisdiction. The exercise of authority was not available to the High Court because in view of section 117, the CPC, the provisions of the Code Applied to the High Court and the High Court, it also had the power to make the error clear on the face of the record, in exercising the inherent jurisdiction, under the Code that it had the authority Can review this order made using jurisdiction. The review was not aligned with the appeal and the error should be clear and unambiguous and should not be required to attract the review. Extensive debate cannot be excused from revisiting the case and the authority to review the court's decision was solely arbitrary and not necessarily one of the reasons behind granting the court the discretionary power to review. Can be stopped.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firm from Battagram lawyer