Find a Lawyer

JAN MUHAMMAD, ADVOCATE LODHRAN versus MUHAMMAD ALTAF, ADVOCATE, BAR ASSOCIATION, LODHRAN

Punjab Legal Practitioners & Bar Council Rules 1974 R5 11 (i) & (xii) Memorandum Association, 1981, Arts 5 (d) and 45 Election Petition The challenged candidate was challenged on the basis that the Election Board Did not comply with the directions issued by the Punjab Bar Council and allowed the voters to cast their votes without the preparation of the Identity Cards issued by the Punjab Bar Council and some of the advocates voted on the ballot. Who were not El. The voters / members of the place but the M / B returnees who opposed the election petition prepared a photocopy of the under-tax given by the voters / members of the candidates, which was agreed that the Punjab Bar Council Identity Card issued by the CBI, such action was waived against R5 11 (xii) of Punjab Legal Practitioners and Bar Council Council Rules 1974 and against directions issued by Punjab Bar Council. At the polling parties, rules and regulations could not be allowed to be ignored. The non-production of the ID card was clearing the irregularities and illegal acts by the Election Board, and because of this Election Board Act, certain individuals were allowed to cast their votes on the spot. It is said that individuals / lawyers were not eligible to cast their votes and were not eligible to be a member of the Voters / Place L, except to submit a statement which was required under the rules in a particular way. Is. It was done this way and not in any other way. Don't justify the election board famous high court advocate from Shaheed Benazirabad lawyer