MUHAMMAD ARIF versus THE STATE
The Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10 (4) and the 7 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), defining Section 7 evidence, the accused committed a gross brutal abuse of a nine-year-old girl. Had committed His statement was substantiated by the Medical Evidence and Positive Chemical Examiner's report by Section 10 (4) of the Medical Evidence and Enforcement Hood Ordinance 1979, and is subject to Section 7. The two accused cannot be punished under 5 10 (4) of the said ordinance if they are not mature and consequently their sentence was changed to Section 7 of the said ordinance and they were sentenced to five years imprisonment. ? In this case, the accused was not liable to be punished under Section 7 (a) of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 and was instead punished under Section 7 (b) of the said Act. And they were sentenced to suffer. In addition, each has been fined for life and the two sentences have been ordered to run together with the benefit of Section 382B, CR PC.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of advocates from Murree lawyer
