Find a Lawyer

GULZAR AHMAD versus ZAHIDA PARVEEN

West Pakistan Citizens Rental Ordinance 1959 Section 13 (2) (i) (ii) (a) and 15 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 The default tenant in paying rent and paying the premises The compound was allegedly completed. He had already vacated the premises and was no longer in possession of the premises when the alleged sub-tenant claimed he had rented the house from the landlord's husband when the landlord was no longer the landlord. The alleged sub-tenant was claiming to have rented the property from the landlord's husband if the tenant claimed that he had evacuated the premises and after his leave, the landlord's husband allegedly sold all. When the tenant was leased, the person moved the tenant to prove that the vacant property had been given. For the landlord and when the tenant was terminated after the tenancy was terminated, neither the proprietor husband was summoned who allegedly rented the house to all the tenant nor was it proved There was no evidence to suggest that the landlord between the landlord and the tenant had been restored; the ownership of the landlord's property did not prove to be returned, in the absence of any evidence, the husband informed the question. Landlord on leasehold rent, slaughtering proved to be a default in paying rent The tenant has to drive the idol, made of sayltng default controller down and Appellate Authority rent payments of rent ordered correctly. when you need a advocate from Chakwal lawyer