Find a Lawyer

AMIR HUSSAIN SHAH versus RENJHA

Punjab Tenancy Act 1887 Section 5 Occupancy Rights, Professional Rights, Property Based Claims The plaintiff asserted that his predecessor on the suit land had begun to occupy interest in the year 1898 and that he or his predecessor was an official. They were not paying any rent other than payment. The two courts below dismissed the case. Any person claiming possession right under the provisions of section 5, Punjab Tenancy Act, 1887, had to prove that he was in his possession for a period of 30 years before the commencement of Punjab. The Tenancy Act, 1887, ie 1 11 1887, would only presume that such a person was possessed by a grandfather or grandfather for two generations in the male race, that any person could be charged and proved. Did not occupy it. As the owner of the land for 30 years, the plaintiff had to prove that the suit land was in the possession of the person on 1 11 1887. o Successors in interest claimed the provisions of the Punjab Tenancy Act, 1887, the acquisition of rights was not allowed after the passage of this Act. best advocate from Kamra lawyer