Find a Lawyer

IT-AS. NOS. 1416/KB AND 1417/KB OF 1999-2000 versus IT-AS. NOS. 1416/KB AND 1417/KB OF 1999-2000

Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Sections 156, 86, 88, 59 (1), 50 (7C), 80D, 52 and 52A Error correction by self-assessment scheme Failure to deduct or pay tax through additional tax deduction The responsibility of the individuals was accepted under the Self Assessment Scheme, the assessment was reformed under section 156 of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 and taxed under Section 50 (7C) of the Ordinance, with which The amount earned by winning the prize bond was taxed at the rate of 7%. The assessee, of the additional tax under section 88, Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, claimed that the tax was deducted from the Authority and such payment / income was obligated under Section 80D of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979. The tax was done under the government which had nothing to do with it. It has been filed under the Return Self-Assessment Scheme that the Assessing Officer can initiate proceedings under Section 52 and 52A as well as Section 86 of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 and that he is responsible for the reduction in the value received by the Assessment. was not. The filing of tax under Section 50 (7C) of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 as no individual award was more than Rs 25,000. Under Section 156 of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979, a legally probation officer was wrongfully excused from jurisdiction. The Income Tax Ordinance is included in Sections 52 and 52A of 1979, both without any jurisdiction under Sections 57 and 88, which the Appellate Tribunal canceled with the observation that Sections 52 and 52A of the Assessing Officer Ordinance. Can initiate proceedings if its advice is advised and the law guaranteed. property advocates from Moro lawyer