Find a Lawyer

RAZIA BEGUM versus CANTONMENT BOARD, CLIFTON

Articles 68, 84 and 277 of the Constitution of Pakistan 1973 (1973), Article 199 Assessment of Constitutional Appeal Assessment Approval of the appeal filed against the Assessment Order has been deleted by the Appellate Authority, the petitioner / property owner filed a constitutional petition. That the application and appeal of this assessment order approved by the Authority be deemed to be excessive, void and void, and the constitutional petition against the principles of natural justice was resisted on the basis that it Not applicable because the applicant has to modify it under section 277 of the Cantonment Act 1924 The second was appropriate and respect for the applicant's property was just as reasonable and reasonable as considering the market rental value of the property located in the same area, as compared to other properties in the area. The question was, in fact, a controversial question and the High Court, in exercising constitutional jurisdiction, could not go into the security relief question that needed to seek and record evidence regarding constitutional jurisdiction, mainly in a matter as soon as possible. Remedy was to provide where any broad of complex or controversial facts Executive authority would be set up to defuse action where this was not possible without ftys. It is to be said that the review conducted by the authorities was an act which, considering that the provisions of the law empowered the authorities to look at the total annual rent in respect of the properties which the financial year and Other properties can be legally acquired in connection with the property. The same when you need a advocate from Mangal Sada lawyer