Find a Lawyer

NAZAR KHAN versus STATE

The Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/34 evidence was not appreciated as it was stated by the prosecution's witnesses and presence and witnesses that witnesses were highly skeptical that the accused was shown with 12 bore shotguns. And he was charged. Fired a shotgun, but no 12 bore was recovered, nor any bullet fired from the wall that had the marks of the collision and instead only 7 mm was fired. It was there. The crime, attributed to the fugitive co-accused, was, thus, carried out by a person armed with a rifle and no shotgun was used in the incident, in connection with the recording of the incident statement in the police prosecution and Contradictions were found in the statements of the prosecution witness. The witness stated that his statement was recorded at the police station there, and then the complainant stated that the prosecutor's witness did not state the incident at the police station, but he was detained with the motive. And later on the inquest, contradiction was found between the complainant and the other witness of the prosecution, and the complaining party confessed to the previous enmity between them and eyewitnesses also testified. The close relationship of the deceased occurred under the rule of interested witnesses and the rule and caution was demanded that independent cooperation should be sought in the prosecution case, but in the event of circumstantial evidence, no freelance resolution would be required. The testimony of the witnesses was not confirmed. Stayed on site planning and recovery best law firm from Farooqabad lawyer