Find a Lawyer

LAIS KHAN versus THE STATE

Section 302 Evidence Testimony Broadcast Day Light Murder Report Reduction in punishment, which was made promptly, eyewitnesses provided a permanent account of the incident and nothing can be determined about the defendants. Yet he was examined for a long time in the FIR. The prosecution's witness later confirmed all of his material points in his court statement, and his statement was further supported by the prosecution's other witness. Which led to Kalashnikov's firing from the very beginning, and recovering from six places was a tightly connected situation. Was. The evidence was also, according to the ocular testimony, that there was no serious rivalry between the parties that could serve as a motivating factor to falsely include the accused involved in such crime, and why the real culprit would be the accused. Why to Include False Because Revenge was an Extraordinary Occupation of the accused and his stay for about eight months was also a controversial situation in which he had a strong tendency to support a prosecution case. , The statement made by the defense witness proved to be absolutely baseless by the standard of attracting confidence, Stgash successfully proved its case against the accused. It was endorsed, but the transparent part of the litigation was not transparent, it could easily be considered a pardon, the feature being that the trial court changed the death sentence to life imprisonment. us immigration advocates from Gilgit lawyer