JAVED KAYANI versus MUHAMMAD IQBAL
Cantonment Rent Restrictions Act 1963 S17 (4) (5) (6) Personal Owner's Own Need To Protect Tenant Landlord To Evict Tenant Personally, Needed, Accumulated, Material Facts Landlord also had to take into account the rent controller and if his statement was not subject to cross inspection and was also in compliance with the request, the question of personal necessity was restricted to the Cantonment Rent Ordinance section. 17 had to be read in the context of protection (6). 1963, which certifies the rent controller to consider the entire proof in affirmation, and the tenant must have the evidence in denial and then conclude that if the personal requirement is presented Whether or not and without reference to the statement or the impression that the evidence was scrutinized, the request for a firm response to the surmises and speculations could not be revoked.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocates from Gadoon Amazai lawyer