On the documentary evidence recorded on the record, along with the superior right of the appellate court, following the oral consideration of the provisions of section 15 and 21 of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1913 (Civil Procedure Code v. 1908), the second appeal for section 100 pre-arrest. It was concluded that the tables on the record made by the shopkeepers did not link them to the common ancestor of the seller, as they claim to prove their right to self-determination in relation to the land in dispute. As such, such relationships were never specifically negotiated by the shopkeepers since the beginning of the case. But the first time he was requested to amend his written statement, the High Court, in the second appeal, had limited power and the party in the second appeal had to bring its case under the purview of Section 100, the CPC said. Given the Appellate Court's reasonable decision below. On the record, not law enforcement and no fault of the law or fault, the second appeal cannot be interfered with by the High Court. al
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
