Find a Lawyer

MUZAFFAR versus AHMED SHER

Sindh Tenant Premise Ordinance 1979 Sections 10 (3) and 15 (2) (ii) forcibly defaulted on payment of rent, which paid rent to the landlord and received rent receipts, suddenly stopped paying rent to the landlord. The tenant had refused to accept that the tenant had failed to produce any evidence to prove that the landlord refused to accept the rent even if the landlord refused to accept the rent. Yes, even then the first tenant had a responsibility to get the landlord rent by post office. The landlord should have submitted the rent to the rent controller with a notice on the order and the same tenant's refusal, but without sending the rent to the landlord through the first mini-order, the landlord directly controlled the landlord's tenant. Began collecting rentals without notice that failed to comply. With the provisions of section 10 (3), the Sindh Rated Premises Ordinance, 1979, was rightly ordered to exclude it from these situations, demanding that it be intermittent. advocates from Feroz Walla lawyer