Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes
Or unlock 10 direct numbers for Rs 1,000

RECKITT & COLMAN OF PAKISTAN LTD. versus SAIFUDDIN G. LOTIA


Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance 1979 Section 15 Changes in the default property for payment of rent cannot be proved by the tenant for the payment of rent by notice to the tenant as neither of the checks was properly exhibited. Nor is it mentioned to indicate the tender dates of the checks. The rent was dispatched at the appropriate time when the tenant also failed to prove that the landlord had any hesitation in receiving the rent for the disputed period or refused to receive the rent, and thus the tenant had to pay his rent. Could not take responsibility when once a covenant was made it could not be wiped out. It will not be later deducted from the payment of rent and the fine which was due to default.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
advocate for immigration from Swat lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Explore

Platform

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Terms Privacy Policy Refund Policy Delivery Policy Made in Pakistan 🇵🇰
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.