Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASHRAF versus STATE

No one was named in the FIR's definition of proof of Pakistan Penal Code Section 2/2 / evidence34 and no details of the accused were given in the statement of the victim's wife that she was present in the court at the trial If I had identified the accused, that was not enough to sustain the sentence. There was no evidence in the record that any motive against the accused in the execution sentence, which was first given during an interrogation by an informant or by a trial witness, or before the trial court, was not in the record The accused responsible for the murder of the victim has been accused of theft after a month and eleven days after the incident and it could not be ascertained from a place that was accessible to everyone. The defendant's extra-judicial confession witness did not say what words the defendants used in the extra-judicial confession. Saying that the accused confessed to their crime, especially when the statement o The witness was recorded 7/8 days after the incident and the accused was arrested after the alleged extra-judicial confession. When the prosecutor failed to prove his case against the suspects beyond the shadow of a doubt and the prosecutor's case was filled with suspicion, his benefit was tried by the trial court, and the accused were convicted and the accused. Was acquitted of the charge against them. registration advocate from Bagh lawyer