Find a Lawyer

MATLOOB HUSSAIN SHAH versus S.H.O.

Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 491 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Petition After detecting false imprisonment, it was presented to the court by Bailiff and stated his age was 19 and the applicant was sent to his Confessed to being legally married. The husband with whom he had voluntarily entered into a marriage contract and expressed a desire to rejoin her and was also told that he had a criminal case related to the alleged abduction by mistake, as well as marital rights. The rehabilitation case was also under trial, no doubt, the relevant courts, but at the same time the High Court could not forget that the main purpose of the petition filed in the nature of imprisonment corpus was to restrict the freedom of any citizen. Which the respondents mistakenly imprisoned. Against his wishes and rejecting his constitutional and legal rights as per his wishes with the rt petitioner appointed by the High Court under independence immigration advocates phone number from Bhera lawyer