Find a Lawyer

YASMIN versus GHULAM HUSSAIN

The Azad Jammu and Kashmir Family Courts Act 1993 Section 7 (2) application for the summoning of witnesses and the preparation of documentary evidence was rejected by the Family Court with the observation that in support of the number of witnesses, their names and addresses and To summarize the facts which they will dismiss, the law was required to be presented to the plaintiff and the law did not give the family court the authority to present any evidence to the parties or to any other witness. We will not allow any witness to be introduced at any stage, no doubt provided a brief summary. Oh The facts and names of the witnesses and the names and addresses that will be presented in support of the claim, but in section 7 (2) of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act 1964, the authority of the Family Court was not barred so that the parties did not Be allowed to present evidence. At any stage after section 7 (2), under the West Pakistan Family Courts Act, 1964, the court was given sufficient powers to summon any document or summon any witness. The application of either party, even in the opinion of the court, was in the interest of the observation of justice by the Family Court while rejecting the request for witnesses and the preparation of the documents was a wrong Family Court, while the decision of the decision. It wasn't on his mind. The merits of the petition, while the court was obliged to make the same decision on merit. The family court order was set aside power of attorney advocate Poonch lawyer