IDRIS AHMED RIZWANI versus FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
The Federal Public Service Commission, which remained on the appellant ad hoc appointment for several years from the non-confirmation of such appointment to the Civil Servants Act 1973, for these reasons did not recommend the applicant for this position and did not have the required qualifications Did not own The same order of the Public Service Commission was dismissed before the Federal Ombudsman, which returned the case with the direction to file an appeal before the appropriate forum, a government employee suspended the Public Service Commission order before the High Court in the constitutional petition. But he withdrew. The government employee's latest filing appeal was denied before the service tribunal when it was banned with the observation that the public servant is not only a domineering person but also lacks the required qualifications; Was on the right track. Prior to Haig, the Public Service Commission's proceedings / orders were withdrawn by the court's constitutional petition reserving the right to file a new petition by the applicant, after which the appropriate forum appeal was dismissed. The employee was therefore in his favor to resurrect.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Phagwar lawyer