Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHARIF SHAR versus STATE

The Criminal Investigation Criminal Procedure Code (v. 1898), Sections 537 and 156C of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997, fail to mention the names of the advisers for the parade identified in the charge shed after the investigation was completed as an investigating officer. had lived. With the result that these counselors were not examined by the trial court and the trial resulted in the acquittal of the accused from the evidence, the identity counsel was presented by the sub-divisional magistrate, in whose presence the address was transferred to the test counsel. With the names of the advisers. If, due to a major mistake / omission, an irregularity was committed by the accused / Investigation Officer which could have been corrected by the trial court summoning the advisers and it was stated that due to the irregularities The trial cannot be terminated because it was curable under 5. 537, the CR PC accused, even otherwise, could not be convicted because it did not prove beyond the shadow that he was deliberately and illegally, pursuing the case without hesitation. I was unsuccessful and had violated my duties and the culprits were punished. famous high court advocate from Chashma lawyer