Find a Lawyer

UMER KEYAZ versus STATE

The Pakistan Penal Code Section 302 West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), after the testimony of Section 13 evidence, the accused fled and the victim's brother pursued the accused, which was neither unnatural nor impossible. Because the suspect had gone unharmed after throwing Kalashnikov. Running the fields, which were later found to children in the field, were handed over to the women of Kalashnikov's house, which was used in the incident, the complainant presented the investigating officer and did not say It may be stated that Kalashnikov was charged on the accused Kalashnikov and the evacuated exports were sent to the forensic science laboratory for expert opinion and the report was added to the vacancies. The real brother of the deceased cannot be interpreted as interest. Only testify that his relationship with her is dead because there is no resentment Tedashmani between the complainant and the accused had strong support from the statement of the second witness when the medical case of Kalashnikov's recovery The complainant was fully confirmed in the report and there was no situation that could have led to the far-reaching trend of identity reduction. The importance of ocular or circumstantial evidence compared to the evidence of the prosecutor when the defendant's locations were not so weighty and powerful that the power of identifying the evidence of the prosecutor was lost or in any way beyond doubt. Was able to prove. Against the accused, the trial court convicted the accused list of supreme court advocates from Bahawalnagar lawyer