Find a Lawyer

MAQSOOD PERVEZ versus STATE

The Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302/34, 323/34 and 353/34 re-examining the evidence (the police constable) or any of the prosecution's witnesses (police officer) records established that the accused, the accused, and the prosecution's witnesses were between the prosecution witnesses. Suddenly the trouble started and the principal suspect started because the accused had a pistol and when prosecutor's witnesses were called, he started to run away and when he was chased, he fired two bullets in the air. It cannot be believed that when the other accused had either seized the body or surrounded it as it opened fire on the victim. Was. The act was not only dangerous to his life, but it seems that when he initially started working, there was no reason to resort to it. After considering the prosecution's witnesses (police officers), on the one hand, what happened between the victim and the prosecution witnesses and on the other hand the principal suspect was abrupt and suddenly, as if the result of the confession by the real accused. was not. The evidence of any pre-determined plan was not sufficient to conclude that any of the accused persons, at any stage, jointly with the principal accused intended to commit the murder, therefore, for their individual actions. They will be responsible. In the absence of any evidence in connection with their common intention, the determination of the defendant's entire conduct may be determined by the whole of the accused's conduct, not by any individual act that he did on occasion, beyond any reasonable doubt. Failed to submit default design proposal with accused principal accused of murder immigration advocate from Laliah lawyer