Find a Lawyer

AKHTAR ALI versus EJAZ AHMAD

The Special Relief Act 1877 has been proposed to resign from the plaintiff, in order to hold Section 9 of the Oaths Act (X of 1873), Section 8 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 of the Constitutional Petition suit, if the defendant claims This case will be decided. The defendant accepted the oath regarding the Koran, and the court dismissed the claim filed by the defendants on the oath by the defendants, according to the defendant's offer, the defendant was sworn in No withdrawal from his statement regarding the trial decision was upheld. The appellate court defendants, in their constitutional petition, first challenged the unanimous decision of the courts on the basis that the plaintiff made a statement in court in his personal capacity, the statement was not binding on the remaining plaintiffs and the second was that And there were no statements from the parties that accepted. It was recorded separately and that the trial court put pressure on the claimants who do WA themselves to play a lawyer who was not bound to the other plaintiff by the statement made by one of the plaintiffs in connection with the affidavit because the plaintiff who was the other Counsel for the plaintiff continued and had a common interest with others. He voluntarily offered to the defendants which was accepted by the defendants and he took an oath accordingly when presented by the plaintiff. If the offer was accepted, the parties were bound by the agreement and it was enforceable under the law. The offer had been unable to separate statements exact record of words and acceptance of any of the defendants famous high court advocate from Lodhran lawyer