Find a Lawyer

EJAZ KARIMI versus ALI BAKSH

Sindh Tenant Premise Ordinance 1979 Section 15 (2) (vii) examined his son in court to prove that the landlord's personal need for the use of the son for his son's business, The statement said. That he needed to shop with good faith for his use because he intended to set up a stationary and photostat machine business. The second landlord inspected it also confirmed to the landlord and his son the tenant that the shop owner was not fit for use in the dispute. Or his son had no power because it was beneficial for the landlord and his son to set up business on the right path so that the tenant could run the proposed business in the adjoining house. The controller failed to prove ownership of the second store, in the circumstances, allowed the landlord the right to evict, in view of the personal need property advocates from Gujar Khan lawyer