KAUSAR MUSA JEE versus NIAZ AHMAD
Specific Relief Act 1877 Sections 42 and 54 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), easement, declaration of suit and injunction Defendants had arrested that if the construction of a multi-storeyed building was completed, it would have to light it. The route will be closed. Air house litigation was set during the suit before ventilators, exhaust fans and stairs to the house, which, after inspecting the scene, submitted its report supporting the plaintiff's case. , The Court of Appeal had thoroughly reviewed the evidence available on record. And on the basis of the independent assessment it was concluded that no case was brought by the plaintiffs. The reviewing court upheld the appellate court's finding as there was no irregularity or illegality identified in the order of appeal. What was that The fact is, by entering the house, do nothing to make it known that the construction of its multi-storeyed building will block the plaintiff's home's light and air, though the ease of light and air. A right has been established, so no person is entitled to obey this order unless its ease is materially and materially affected. Enjoyed the building that was claimed to be easy
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Warburton lawyer