Find a Lawyer

I.T.A. NO.430/LB OF 1999 versus I.T.A. NO.430/LB OF 1999

Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Section 66A, 62 and 156 The Deputy Commissioner's inspection powers to review the orders of the Deputy Commissioners are the association of eighty persons who receive income from the hospital assessment section 62, Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Was finalized under. Patients and Damages Estimated Revising Authority has canceled the assessment on the basis that it was declared that the receipts from the department's patients were less than the actual receipts as per the certificate submitted by the Assisi in the total amount as per the certificate. The difference is the difference and it was an error of calculation that was treatable under section 156, Income Tax Ordinance 1979 and in the presence of correction provisions, the provisions of section 66A, Income Tax Ordinance 1979 There was no justification and furthermore, if there was no loss in revenue, I found that the difference in the total receipts The count was acid damage of the data and therefore, Article 66, under the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 was just under expectations can not be a loss of revenue. Accuracy assessment order was canceled upon receipt of a discrepancy in the amount declared on the receivables account. Due to the disparity in the total receipts declared by the Assisi in the overall certificates presented by the various departments and the various companies issued by the Assisi, it was accepted and approved by the Assessing Officer to participate. Wally was negligent. Total receipts from the Assessing Officer Companies were accepted by the Assessing Officer, therefore, based on the difference in the total amount shown on the certificate, Section 66 best law firms from Dhoun Kal lawyer