Find a Lawyer

STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN versus SURRAYA SAJJAD

Sections 2 (i) and 15 explain the tenancy of the tenant in the termination of the tenancy agreement set forth in the payment of water charges even if the relevant dispute was raised by the landlord on a regular basis. The tenant was not responsible for paying the water. From the beginning of the tenancy, the tenant becomes so liable after the expiry of the contract that the validity remains in force even after the expiration of the original tenancy agreement, as long as such provisions are subject to the provisions of the Constitution. Are not profitable. The clarification of the rent expressed in section 2 (i) of the Sindh Rated Premises Ordinance, 1979, created no additional obligation on the tenant and there was no other provision under which the contract could be annulled. , The rental controller rightfully dismissed the removal request. Filed on such default basis registration advocate from Kashmir lawyer