I.T.AS. NOS. 1490/LB TO 1494/LB OF 1999 versus I.T.AS. NOS. 1490/LB TO 1494/LB OF 1999
Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Sections 52 and 50 are the liability of a person who fails to deduct tax or pay tax. Received in the form of trade concession and partly as a commission, in proportionate proportions of 70 70 and 30 the, which was previously accepted by the appellate authority, which directed the Assigning Officer to treat 70 percent of the payments. Income tax assessment was primarily the work of the Revenue Authorities and not the heavy payment of the person who was paying them, which would have incurred additional costs as the assessee was required to deduct the tax and pay the treasury. Has to add staff to pay. And then follow the legal proceedings too and there was no reward for claiming the services officer for these services was not investigated by the diagnostic officer in-depth to investigate the matter as it was commissioned and commercial exempt. May discriminate between officers evaluating. Copies of accounts available on the diagnostic record are cited to confirm the request of the Diagnostic Appellate Tribunal, which in the circumstances refused to interfere with the order of the First Appellate Authority.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
