SHEHZAD QAMAR versus THE STATE
Appreciating the evidence under Section 6/9 of the Control of Drugs Act 1997, these three accused were real brothers and it would hardly appeal to any intelligent mind that they would carry large quantities of marijuana in their busy hours in the morning. Were taking , The day the private citizen who was made an adviser was not inspected and left behind and instead was examined by another police officer and no explanation was given by the prosecution witness. The complainant filed a contradictory statement for change, which contradicted the statement of the prosecution's witness. The Chemical Examiner's report stated that samples were sent on two different dates after allegations of recovery over fifteen days, so the prosecution's evidence could not be termed factual and doubtful, making it a case of any shadow. Failed to prove beyond The trial court provided the suspect with reasonable suspicion, conviction and sentencing
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
power of attorney advocate Daud Khel lawyer
