Find a Lawyer

LAKHI versus THE STATE

Section 302 Appreciating the evidence All material witnesses were closely related, the father of the deceased, who was not an eyewitness, as the prosecution's witnesses told him, so far his statement cannot be relied upon. The other culprit and don't be persuaded. There was evidence linking the accused to the commission of the crime; the police recorded the statement of one of the prosecution witnesses 2/3 days later, with no explanation for the delay in recording their statement under 161, c. RPC's evidence may be denied. Considering that the statements of other prosecution witnesses were not recorded, no explanation was given by the police, the day of the incident, and no explanation of the error could be said that the witness was not present at the time of the incident to prove the crime. Were. The evidence cannot be believed that the evidence of Hatchet's recovery on the suspect's identity was highly skeptical, and insufficient state counsel had clearly acknowledged that the entire prosecution case was doubtful and that the evidence presented by the prosecution was doubtful. No amount of punishment can be maintained on quality. And they were offended lawer from fb area from Sikandarabad lawyer