TALIB HUSSAIN versus STATE
Section 2302 / evidence evidence / evidence 34 Definition of evidence was not mentioned in the FIR at the time and day of the incident and no one was named, one of the prosecution witness who was closely related to the accused. Was a resident of the place located 70 / 70? miles away. About the incident, the prosecution witness who witnessed the recovery of the dagger allegedly recovered the suspect's identity, himself involved in several criminal cases, someone from the area investigating for the recovery of witnesses. Was not involved and no motive was proved against the accused, who was identified by the post-mortem doctor, was not identified and was set on record and the body was found unidentified. Nine months after the first statement, the trial court recorded subpoenaed statements of witnesses Wahoo's in his supplementary statements introduced a new story that was completely different from his earlier statements Case CI had for the conviction of a person accused of the death penalty, irrefutable evidence that had no contact , Should be from unforgivable sources who could not have sustained the death sentence awarded to the accused by the trial court at trial. The suspects were set aside and ordered to be released
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates contact from FR Peshawar / Kohat lawyer