Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE versus STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Section 2302/4 324 / evidence 34 The value of the evidence The complainant's statement in relation to the injuries received by the accused was irrelevant and despite a lengthy examination by the complainant, the accused could not prove that the complainant The wounds on the person were either recovered or the complainant was present on the spot (incident to the occasion) Relationship with the deceased person was not a convincing reason for his refusal to believe the truth. Another prosecutor's witness was a shopkeeper in the victim's neighborhood in the market and the incident occurred near his shop. Yes and after sustaining it, the witnesses suffered injuries on the witnesses' shop. No evidence, according to records, to show that the witness's shop was closed at the time of the incident or that he was not present at the store. The witness was the most natural and independent witness to the incident and despite his friendship with the victim, he had no motive or misconduct against the accused for his involvement in a false case or his dismissal. Or to compensate him with real criminals. The natural and independent witness medical evidence has confirmed the fatal injuries sustained through the use of a sharp weapon and at the same time supported the ocular account, was completely free, natural and truthful and they were each other. Medical evidence and the recovery of the weapons of the crime reinforced their evidence and said that between the minor contradictions and contradictions between them, the witnesses could not influence their testimony, in the circumstances, in the trial court, section 2302 (b. ), Guilty under PPC when you need a advocate from Qambar lawyer