MUHAMMAD ISMAIL versus STATE
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 497 of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), Section 420/468/47 7 A / 34 of the Prevention of Corruption Act (II of 1947), Section 5 (2) Bail, against the accused. The alleged offenses were not allowed Section 497 (1), covered by the prohibited clause contained in the CCPC, because the offenses could not be detected against the accused under Sections 468 and 477A, PPC. Whereas under Section 420, PPC was a crimeable document that was falsely accused of forgery and fraud, the government officer had it. The alleged involvement in the crime with the accused could not be tampered with, and the fact that he had contacted the municipal corporation officials was not yet established at the trial. Was not included in the FIR. This employee may have been cheated by receiving money from the person and cannot be arrested at the bail stage. The interim pre-arrest bail was granted to the co-accused so that in the absence of reasonable grounds to believe the fact that sed was the culprit with whom he was charged, the accused was entitled to bail.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocate from Minchanabad lawyer