WAHEED AHMAD versus THE STATE
The Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/109 definition of evidence was not proved by the prosecution in the long-running dispute over the factory management between the victim and the accused, which could not be expected from the accused, he added to the prosecution's testimony. What was the court confession? The presence of a stranger demonstrated the non-appearance of a witness named in the FIR, who was closely related to the complainant, who showed that he did not want the accused to lie in the case where The evidence was so weak and insignificant that no person of reasonable and modest credence credits the evidence of such a manipulative prosecution. The identity parade held in the case was not genuine; the prosecution did not prove through the testimony of its witnesses that the accused had been identified in court. An alternative to the identification of an unknown offender was not sufficiently acceptable for the parade E case where witnesses knew nothing about the perpetrator of the crime and during the first time he had witnessed it, the accused He was acquitted.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates contact from Leepa lawyer