Find a Lawyer

INHAM KHAN versus ROBINA GUL

Section 5, Schedule 9 and 6 (6) of the West Pakistan Family Court Act, 1964, R 13 Municipal Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition separately, deportation in relation to marriage An order was already issued, the defendant / applicant filed an application for separation of the order, but such requests were rejected by the courts simultaneously or, with the approval of this order Two and a half months later, the defendant / applicant was implicated in the murder case. The summons was sought by the registered post just one day before the date of trial, which did not reach the applicant in time, the service of the applicants was not, in the circumstances, appropriate in the West Pakistan Family Courts Act. As stated in Section 9 (c) of 1964 - within a reasonable time the ex parte decree had to be issued and the bee had no fixed term. The prescribed 13 rule,, in the rules of the West Pakistan Family Courts, 65 1965, has been given thirty days' time to stabilize the previous decree, not in accordance with the positive provision of the Act, under which the ex parte decree An application for separation may be filed at the appropriate time. Do not prevail on the provisions of the said Act, rejecting the order filed by his lawyer, considering that the applicant was imprisoned and summonsed for not appearing properly. His request to do so was in due time, under which the High Court practically set aside the joint decisions of the courts. you list of supreme court advocates from Choppar Hatta lawyer