FAZAL RAHIM KHATTAK versus DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION, N.-W.F.P., PESHAWAR
Border Ad-hoc Civil Servants (Regulatory Services) Act 1987 Section 3 Ad-hoc Appointment To regulate appointments for the higher grades, the public servant in the highest post-minimum salary posts the rank of junior instructor against the post of senior instructor. Was offered. The post but the senior employee instructed by the civil servant to carry out the higher responsibilities of the dispute was to regulate his services to the highest level, as well as all the apprenticeship benefits, such as annual increments, etc. The service tribunal found that the service was done by a civil servant. The nature of the duties given is different. As a Senior Instructor and it was announced that the salary of the employees before the service tribunal was valid, they were entitled to the possibility of joining increments for a period of only three years before the appeal was dismissed. Be found. From the date of his appointment as junior instructor and acting against the vacant post of P-Senior Instructor but not entitled to annual increments, the Service Tribunal rightly found that the Senior Instructor's Post Public Service Commission jurisdiction I am and could not make the grade before a Government Employee Commission, so, this was not a base admin appointment but was held as a Senior Instructor as a stop gap arrangement.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
family advocate from Chacklala lawyer