Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AJMAL versus STATE

Sections 302/34 of the Constitution of Pakistan 1973 and 324 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Sections 7 and 6 of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) were treated inhumane when entering the courtroom. Was made Indiscriminate firing on the complaining party and court personnel and severely injured the complainant's brother, deputy messenger and court reader, thus creating a sense of fear and insecurity among the people, during the trial. As many witnesses were examined. The score fully supported the case of the prosecution against the accused that he opened indiscriminate firing in the county room and was arrested at the same time along with his 30 bore. Pistols, weapons of crime were recovered from the courtroom with lead bullets, five guns, which were sealed and sent to crime for expert opinion and at the same time fired. The accused had also partially confessed to the incident in his statement under Section 2, 2, CRPC, that there was criminal prosecution between him and the victim and their case was resolved on the day of the incident. Prior to this, the court did not examine the accused himself under oath as required under section 4040 ((?), Cr.) The PC partially admitted this. That he was present in court on the day of the incident, he had withheld his involvement in the commission of leave for 29 days on appeal for appeal, for which no reasonable explanation was offered or An application for delay was filed late in the High Court decision somehow online advocate from FR Peshawar lawyer