Find a Lawyer

MERAJ BEGUM versus SHAMSHAD AKHTAR

Specific Relief Act 1877 Section 42 Laws on the Evidence (10 of 1984), Arts 117 and 120 Deletion of documents executed by an old, uneducated and exposed woman, the execution of the registered cell deed was declared controversial and the plaintiff. Denied, in his favor, his execution. The plaintiff was the plaintiff's old, illiterate and bridesmaid, and the defendant was her real daughter. Both courts dismissed the plaintiff's case because the controversial sale certificate was registered and the plaintiff acknowledged his impression of the thumb was consciously acting on the controversial sale process and the defendant, the document The beneficiary failed to prove, through positive evidence, that the case for consideration of this sale was ever paid to the plaintiff, the plaintiff, that he also failed to establish that he had The pass or her husband meant it. Buy property in a dispute where the plaintiff was an old, ignorant and absolutely illiterate woman, the burden was on you to take advantage of the defendant to prove and prove the unforgivable evidence and the accused (her mother) with her husband. Efforts were made to deprive valuable property through fraudulent and misrepresentation decisions and orders. Both courts were set aside and the sale process was canceled top advocate from Gohar Ghoushti lawyer