Find a Lawyer

ABDULLAH KHAN versus STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Section 2?2 / 33337A (i) The testimony of the testimony was based on the complainant's first position in his submission and further counsel's statement regarding his fiduciary statement was taken into account by the prosecution witnesses. Were present and attracted to the scene. After the incident, eyewitnesses were examined for a long time, but the internal value of their evidence could not be ascertained and they reliably explained their presence at the spot where both the accused and the complainant were armed with a shoulder. There were several injuries and the fact was confirmed by the medical certificate presented by the prosecution's witnesses, that all the suspects had jointly started stabbing the complainant and the complainant, and nothing to suggest It was not on record that none of the accused participated in any trial proceedings Yes, in those circumstances, the defendants correctly found out that their joint intention offer had attacked the complaint late and the NT and the joint intention arose at the moment when it was alleged that the joint in the case. The element of intent was lacking, it had no power to record that nothing was on record to show that the complainant and the accused were at odds with each other, all the witnesses satisfactorily explained the incident. Attendance at the place and the accused himself did not deny his presence, the defendant's argument was that the prosecution's witnesses were interested and should have their Intended to falsely impeach, was repelled, in these circumstances would not constitute my relationship with the complainant or the witness. Their top civil advocates from Mustang lawyer