Find a Lawyer

KALSOOM AKHTAR versus FAZAL NOOR

Clauses 42 and 55 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act 1974, the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), the Section 115 suit for declaration and the Permanent Mandatory Decree claimed that the original owner of the property in the dispute was entitled to one-third of it. Has been hanged to an extent. The plaintiff could not present the original copy of this will in favor of the plaintiff, but a certified copy of it is produced, on which the defendant objected that the defendant accepted the defendant as a certified copy of the case. The appellate court dismissed the objection of the plaintiff and the order. Although the original intent was not presented to the trial court by the plaintiff, it was presented to the Revenue Record Appeal Court and attached to it, and without such examination of the record, it was discovered. Went down and the appellate court was heard down for false statements. And not reading the BF record, the High Court could not maintain The appellate court below, using its amended jurisdiction, sent the trial to the trial court to allow the plaintiffs / respondents to present their original copy. May be given alternatively or as a consequence of its loss. pakistani advocates Issa Khel lawyer