Find a Lawyer

IFTIKHAR AHMAD KHILJI versus AZAD GOVERNMENT

Rules 10 R1 (1) and 11 (1) of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Public Service Commission Code of Conduct, VIII of the Jammu and Kashmir Interim Authorization Act (VIII of 1974), section 42 and 44, chaired the meeting of the Public Service Commission, appealed its chairman. Not before. Respondents of the Supreme Court were appointed to the relevant positions on the recommendation of the Public Service Commission; Appellant iii in his writ petition alleged that the appointments were ineligible because on the relevant date the Chairman of the Public Service Commission who was present at the interview. The meeting was not chaired by Azad Jammu and Kashmir Public Service Commission under the Procedure Rules 1994 (Rules 10 (1) and 11 (1) of the Public Service Commission) on matters relating to the quorum and formation of a committee of members of the commission. Did not provide attendance or presided over the chairman's meeting, but instead provided It was said that the duties of the Commission could also be carried out by a committee constituted by the appellant who had appeared for the interview, it should have been raised at the time of the interview that since the chairman was not present, he was not present before any of the members. Were not interviewing because they were not legally eligible to be interviewed, but the appellant was not. The High Court had rightly stated in the circumstances that it was not necessary for the Chairman to be present and preside over the meeting at the time of the interview, otherwise due to time constraints, the High Court had rightly dismissed. online advocate from Amangarh lawyer