Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD GHAZAN versus THE STATE

The Pakistan Penal Code Section 302 evidence defines the conviction of the accused and the complaining party was related to one village and one brother, and on one occasion there were fraternal relations between the two, while the other also involved the murder of the accused's brother. The convict was convicted. Arriving in the village on parole to attend his sisters' wedding party, the accused, who had scores to settle with the deceased, had the opportunity to kill and the time and the circumstances of the accused's presence were not denied. It was daylight. The presence of prosecution witnesses with other villagers and the presence of prosecution witnesses who were natural witnesses and proved completely credible, their testimony is sufficiently convincing and the defendant is in any way a prosecution witness. Failure to disperse the case as definitive evidence of the ocular account was supported. As the site was planned and no contradictions were found in the eye, the calculation of the incident and medical evidence failed to prove that the shooting death of the policeman was in the eyes of the village, but to support the defense version No one was exposed to the evidence and neither the evidence nor the circumstances or the indications deducted from the record were supported. The defense version was a further case of prosecution in retrieving aggressive weapons and was firmly established by the evidence against the accused and the evidence of the Molecular Account, which was also supported by other conflicting material explanatory and investigative evidence. , He was properly convicted under Section 302 (b). PPC, but in view of reducing conditions law websites from Doltala lawyer