MUHAMMAD ANSARUL ISLAM QARNI versus KARACHI STOCK EXCHANGE LTD.
Articles 151 and 152 of Pakistan's Code of Conduct 1908 (1973), Article 185 (3) petitioner, when he was a practicing lawyer and a member of the Advocate on Record Stock Exchange when he was removed from membership. Directed that if within a month, or longer, that the application be made, the applicant informed the court that he had ceased to be a lawyer, then this statement should be included in the decree. That he is a member of the stock exchange, or else it would be only if the order of the directors of the stock exchange was illegal and Altair Wires Ytysnr want the process to continue as the High Court Bar Association informed that a member of his statement and advocate status and no statement regarding their membership. In this decision, the stock exchange was included with the decision of the High Court in which the applicant was of the view that the letter written to the High Court was not appealed while preparing this decree, according to the letter. That he had done no business as a member of the Stock Exchange and had clearly chosen to continue his legal process, in fact the High Court allowed two powers. That is, either to continue as an advocate or to become a member of the stock exchange, he preferred to continue practicing as a lawyer. Under this decision, the Stock Exchange did not include any declaration in relation to his membership. went. The court case was finally settled in the petitioner's appeal against the contents of the order by the high court, sections 151 and 152
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for fresh advocates from Sanghi lawyer