Find a Lawyer

ABDUL AZIZ MEMON versus THE STATE

Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Sections 190, 249A, 265K & 561A Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 391, 395, 427, 451, 147, 144 and 149 increase of crime Removal from action During the complaint filed by the accused under Section 249A of the Magistrate's jurisdiction, the CCP filed an application to add offense under Section 95, PPC: the charge sheet alleged Was wrongly involved before the Judicial Magistrate ordered the said offense to be included in the charge sheet and sent to trial. The trial court, as a fresh addition offense, had modified the trial judge's Special Judge Sessions Judge's Special Judgment before the Judge Magistrate's order before the trial judge, but before the reviewing verdict, the accused stated An application was canceled to cancel the order, which was attacked by the prosecutor. On the basis that before reaching the court to stop proceedings under Section 6161 AA, the PC accused should have followed the Secity provisions. On265K, the CRPC, which was an imperative requirement under the Judicial Magistrate to order a conviction under section 395, the PPC did not comply with its judicial mind and, without specifying the circumstances and the substance, Was observed in the ordinary course of time on which he presented the case. The FC stated that the offense was instituted against the accused / applicant applicant / accused, for the offense punishable under section 395, the PPC in the charge sheet was prosecuted for a more serious and serious offense. Was facing a hearing that he did not actually have. The Magistrate in charge has taken charge of Section 9595, PPC best advocate from Sihala lawyer