Find a Lawyer

IQBAL versus STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/34 Testimony of Evidence The Complainant and Prosecutor's Witness were Close Relatives of the Murderers My Relations to the Witnesses Although there was no reason to deny their testimony, their evidence identified the accused, the deceased's body. Testimony related to dismissal and ocular statement was contradictory The complainant failed to identify the accused at the time of the first trial, while the other four witnesses also testified during the second trial. Failed to identify even though he had said at the first trial that such a fact would be a testimony to himself. It appears on the truth that there were discrepancies in relation to the location and location of the complainant, other prosecution witnesses and the deceased complainant of the police, the prosecution's witnesses, the police and even the doctor's body, but in reality the doctor Had also suppressed the truth. The court, which proved that some other secret hands were wasted, came into action and investigated the police unofficially and without filing an FIR and the post-mortem of the victim, the prosecution witnesses testified about the first incident. I denied the complainant who was the real cause of the incident. Prove that the IFIR was listed after the victim's funeral and was investigated without an FIR in which the allegedly used gun was recovered, allegedly approximately weeks after the arrest. The latter was done from the Ganjanabad area, but did not join any private adviser. Police and gun were not sent to the specialist for inspection. No blank was recovered from the scene of the incident. patent advocate from Shahkot lawyer