Find a Lawyer

GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN versus ALLAH BAKHSH

Court Fees Act 1870 Section 7 (iv) (f) Suit Valuation Act (VII of 1887), Section 8 Civil Procedure Code (VV 1908), Section 96 and O VII, Rr 2, 10 Suits Judicial Fees for Settlement of Suits Account And the notice of appeal on the jurisdiction of the judicial judgment was fixed at Rs. 200 for the trial and jurisdiction for hearing of the cases of the Supreme Court while passing the preliminary injunction, it was stated that the case was section 7 (iv). (f). According to the Judicial Fees Act, 1887 and the primitive value given in the case, although this was true, the plaintiff / appellant received money from the plaintiff / appellant at the time of the approval of the final order on appeal against the plaintiff's preliminary injunction. Will be responsible for the. Determine the trial court's finding on the issue of judicial fees, which includes the amount of the suit, for the purposes of judicial fees and jurisdiction, the suit should have been priced at Rs. Accordingly and the case was referred to the trial court for order to make the plaintiff. The plaintiff paid additional fees to the plaintiff in the reduced court fees, but when the case was re-presented in the appellate court, it changed the memorandum of appeal, stating that the court fee was fixed at Rs. 8,00,000. That was, he had no jurisdiction to hear the appeal on that amount and could be heard by the High Court for the purposes of judicial fees and jurisdiction, the suit was set at Rs 200 in the case, below the appeal court. It did not justify the holding of Rs. 8,00,000 for the purposes of this judicial fee and that, to appeal to the High Court claimant, section 7 (IV) (1) of the Court Fees Act 1870 According to the purpose of the court fee immigration advocates email from Nowshera lawyer