Find a Lawyer

NASAR IQBAL versus STATE

Section 10 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 376 FIR of the Definition of Evidence in which none of the accused was immediately listed in evidence which contained evidence of the victim's child, who was a woman It was through the doctor who inspected the girl and the prosecution witnesses also presented the incident in a positive way and the accused completely imposed the accused, pointing out very minor contradictions. The victim's testimony was attacked by someone who could be of no use to him. The victim's evidence was through an investigating officer who found the accused's blood in the incident. The prosecution confessed to the witnesses who had not been advised to have any enmity with the accused. The prosecution's testimony cannot be declared to be of interest or favor to the accused, which is the accused's judicial confession of the strongest evidence that appears on the record, which is sufficient to warrant a conviction. Was brought on record to show that the defendant's judicial confession was illegal or not voluntary and not true. Such a judicial confession, which, although withdrawn, would have interested defendant's defense witnesses in protecting the accused. And their evidence was convinced that they could not ignore the overwhelming evidence brought on record by the prosecution, which contained evidence of the victim. Not only was it true, but it was supported by legal evidence and the evidence of the prosecution's witnesses and the circumstances, beyond any doubt, was sufficient to prove the accused's guilt beyond the court's decision under which the accused was convicted. Was declared advocate from Alipur lawyer