Articles 8, 9, and 12 of the Delivery Act 1972, Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), by a convicted offender in support of his innocence before the magistrate in writing of evidence against the fugitive, before the magistrate under oath Not submitting a written statement by a convicted offender was that the investigation was not conducted by a competent authority under Section 8 of the Delivery Act, 1972, the evidence was not properly assessed by the Mag Inquiry Magistrate and the Federal Government Did not formulate its independent opinion and did not receive any written notice. The fugitive's statement, therefore, that he was entitled to terminate under Section 12 of the Supreme Court's Delivery of Observations to the Supreme Court in the case of Muhammad Azim Malik, SC 519 of PLD 1989, on the facts of the case. Apply. Appeal denied
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
