Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD KHALID versus THE STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Section 2302/474/7 337 (?) (A) (T) / ?88 / ?99 The prosecution cannot be the cause of the incident as the 55-hour delay in filing an FIR by the complainant The explanation was without explanation. Due to the previous enmity, the complainant involved in the case admitted that a criminal case was registered against him by the father of one of the accused, the case being fought independently except the injured and the complainant, The testimony of the other prosecutors was given. The prosecution charges have been cited by the two serious defendants, their conviction cannot be sustained under section 2302 (c), PPC stated that the offense of co-accused is charged under section 7337 (1) (1). (A) was converted into a PPC, as Shuja-e-Khalafa, and accordingly, the two other accomplices were also sentenced to death on the charges of being fatal, punished under section 2302 (c). Was reasonable and c. According to the convict, the accused was retained, which injured the accused by means of two small arms such as Sota, his sentence was changed to Section 7 T7T, PPC and also to Section 2382. The victim was blamed for paying enough money. , CR PC also handed over all the accused top advocate from Bewal lawyer